Gothic.Black · Paranormal Files

Case File Database

← All cases

GG-2026-052

Hexham Heads

  • Phenomenon Apparitions & Spirits
  • Documentation
    Rating C
    • A — Strong dossier: several independent sources plus primary evidence (original media, records, measurements) a researcher could use without interviewing anyone.
    • B — Well documented: multiple independent witnesses with at least some contemporary primary material, or one witness with substantial primary corroboration (photos, recordings, contemporaneous notes, documents).
    • C — Multi-source but soft: several witnesses or a long run of reports, but mostly testimony and after-the-fact secondary sources (newspapers, folklore collections, later interviews). Little or no primary physical evidence. Regional legend clusters such as the Bridgewater Triangle land here.
    • D — Thin: single witness (or one household), little or no support beyond the account. Normal for a sincere personal experience.
    • E — Incomplete or not yet assessed. Every new submission starts here until staff have read it.
  • Evidence & media 4 items
  • Status Historic
  • Location Hexham, England

Summary

Discovered in 1972 by two boys in Hexham, England, the Hexham Heads were two small stone carvings that triggered widespread poltergeist reports. Witnesses claimed the artifacts caused unexplained movements, temperature drops, and spectral werewolf-like apparitions. Despite a local man claiming he made them as toys in the 1950s, the carving composition and mysterious, subsequent loss of the artifacts leave their true origin debated.

Background

The heads came out of the back garden at 3 Rede Avenue, Hexham, Northumberland. Colin and Leslie Robson, brothers of about eleven and nine, dug them up in 1971. Each is roughly the size of a tennis ball, a stone-like ball with a face and a stump at the neck, as if it had once sat on something. Later writers called one the boy, with the hair cut in stripes, and the other the girl or the hag, with bulging eyes. The Museum of Antiquities in Newcastle was already writing about them by 29 October 1971. On 25 November they were packed and sent to Anne Ross, a Celtic archaeologist at the University of Southampton.

While they were still in the house, the Robsons said the heads turned by themselves overnight, and that bottles were thrown. Jenny Robson, the boys’ mother, told the BBC programme Nationwide in 1976 that a few nights after she showed the heads to the woman next door, that neighbor saw a creature in her bedroom, half man and half beast, and that the husband watched it pad down the stairs. Later retellings call the neighbor Mrs Dodd and the figure a sheep or a goat. A story told in Hexham afterward, and written up by Stuart Ferrol, has a drunk that same night with a sheep carcass from a nearby slaughterhouse on his back. That is a local tale, not a police note.

Ross had written on the old cult of the head. She published these two in Archaeologia Aeliana in 1973, among other Celtic heads, and she said at the time that where they came from and when they were made were problems. On Nationwide she said that a few days after they arrived in Southampton she woke in a panic and saw a figure about six feet high, slightly stooped, going out of the door. The upper part, she said, was a wolf and the lower part human, covered in black or very dark fur. She followed the sound down the stairs and lost it toward the back of the house. A few days later, she said, her teenage daughter came in from school, opened the front door, and saw a black thing as near a werewolf as she could picture, leap the banisters, land with a padded sound, and vanish into the music room. Ross said that the day the heads left the house, her husband included, everyone said a cloud had lifted.

The Evening Chronicle of 3 March 1972, under the headline “Terror from the Celtic mists,” carried a different account of the objects. Desmond Craigie, who had lived at 3 Rede Avenue, told the paper he had made them about sixteen years earlier, from bits of stone and mortar, to amuse his daughter. He said he had made three, that one was lost, and that the others had sat in the garden for years. He made new ones to show he could. They did not look like the pair from the garden. The same cuttings note that Colin Robson had been making clay heads at school before the find.

The stones were sampled twice. In 1972 Professor F. Hodson at Southampton looked at them under a microscope and called both a very coarse sandstone, with rounded quartz grains, and pointed to a local rock. D. A. Robson at Newcastle took a piece out. His report says the material is not like any natural sandstone of that country. In a real sandstone the grains touch. In these heads a fine matrix holds much larger quartz grains that mostly do not touch, and the grains are rounded and polished in the way of beach sand or builder’s sand, not the local stone. He concluded they were an artificial cement. If they were modern, he wrote, the sand was a builder’s sand. If they were old, someone would have had to carry seaside sand inland and mix it with ground limestone. The museum, having decided they were modern, wrote to Craigie in April 1975 that the tests were finished, the heads had gone back to the Robsons, and the file was closed.

That is not the last address on paper. Paul Screeton, working from the same letters, also has Anne Ross saying in 1977 that the heads were still in a box in Southampton, with a geologist who had sampled them. The chemist Don Robins, not the Newcastle geologist, took possession of a pair on 21 September 1977. In February 1978 he passed them to a dowser, Frank Hyde. After a car accident, Hyde was not there to return them, and that pair has not been produced since. The museum does not have them. Which box was the one the boys dug up, and which was a copy Craigie or someone else had made, is not settled by the letters.

Witness statement

No statement on file.

Evidence & media

myth-of-the-evil-heads-2
Newspaper article, 1974
bord-book-clipping
extract-from-journal
Page from the analysis of the heads.
9gUVlaOQbtpSEsn3ki9nhi1b1ms
Colin and Leslie Robson with one of the heads.

Sources

Further reading

Investigation timeline

  • 2026-09-25 — Historical file submitted.
  • 2026-09-25 — Historical file accepted and published.

Research notes

Historical research: Archaeological Analysis and Skeptical Synthesis

Archaeological and folkloric analyses classify the Hexham Heads primarily as a twentieth-century material misattribution compounded by localized mass contagion and media amplification.

Petrological evaluations performed by Newcastle University demonstrated that the physical composition consisted of a coarse cement-and-mortar matrix containing artificial additives, directly supporting Desmond Craigie’s testimony of crafting the objects in 1956. Folklorists emphasize that the British Isles feature thousands of carved stone heads spanning Iron Age Celtic cults, Romano-British shrines, and modern folk art. The supernatural events reported by the Robson family and Dr. Anne Ross are evaluated through anomalistic psychology as acute priming and confirmation bias: once the artifacts were framed as "ancient Celtic cult items," environmental noises and sleep paralysis episodes were unconsciously interpreted through a mythological, lycanthropic lens.

Historical research: Unresolved Parapsychological and Anomaly Questions

While the physical artifacts are widely regarded as mid-century concrete creations, several parapsychological anomalies remain debated among open-minded researchers:

Incongruous Witness Consistency: Independent witnesses across different geographic locations—who had no prior communication regarding the artifacts—reported identical sensory experiences, specifically a dark, hirsute, therianthropic entity accompanied by sudden temperature drops. Parapsychologists question whether the objects acted as a focal point for Recurrent Spontaneous Psychokinesis (RSPK) or a "psychometric trigger," regardless of their actual age.

Typological Discrepancy: Certain researchers noted that Craigie's demonstration replicas did not precisely match the stylistic dimensions or hair detailing documented in initial photographs of the original "Boy" and "Girl" heads. The sudden disappearance of the original artifacts before secondary, peer-reviewed petrological imaging could take place leaves the definitive physical record incomplete.

Propose evidence & media, a source citation, further reading, a research note, a related case, or a series link. Staff review before anything is added.

Discussion