Documentation archive — ratings measure evidence volume, not truth.
← Back to case
Adding to GG-2026-202 — Ängelholm UFO Encounter.
Open research question
What evidence did Clas Svahn identify as inconsistent with or damaging to Carlsson's account?
A source, research note, or further-reading link closes this question when staff accept it. Evidence and corrections stay attached for staff and do not close it by themselves.
Staff review every contribution before it is added to the file. A correction is a proposal: accepting it does not replace the official record. Rejected items are handled like rejected case submissions.